MRI EXAMINATION OF THE LEFT LOWER EXTREMITY WITH AND WITHOUT CONTRAST
INDICATION FOR
STUDY: Cystic mass in the
superior left ankle, which was marked.
Soft tissue swelling. Previous
ultrasound examination from XXXXXXX showing a cystic mass measuring
up to 2.3 cm.
FINDINGS: Multiplanar and multisequence
imaging was obtained on the Open MRI with and without contrast. The area of concern was marked. The patient appears to have some artifact
from metallic densities. The patient
also has significant motion artifact on some of the coronal images limiting the
examination. The area of concern is
identified and shows no significant abnormal enhancement. The bony structures appear within normal
limits. There appears to be slight
chronic edema in the soft tissues. The
marker was seen on approximately image 8 of series 7 on the post-contrast
images. The cystic area identified on
the ultrasound is also identified on the MRI on image 8 of series 6 and image 8
of series 7. This cystic collection may
represent a small hematoma and would recommend clinical correlation. There does not appear to be solid enhancing
lesion or mass. Given the chronic edema
it appears in the soft tissues, it is hard to evaluate, but would recommend
clinical correlation and question if there is inflammatory clinical findings to
suggest cellulitis. The possibility of
small abscess cannot completely be excluded.
There is no other significant abnormality to the soft tissues, bony
structures, or muscle planes clearly identified.
IMPRESSION: Small cystic mass identified, which
correlates with what was seen on the ultrasound examination and on the MRI, it
measures approximately 1.5 cm in a craniocaudal direction and 8 mm in the
anterior and posterior direction and approximately 2 cm in length. This correlates with what was seen on the
ultrasound examination. There are some
surrounding vessels. This does not
appear vascular in nature. There is no
significant abnormal enhancement once again.
Small cystic
collection noted in the subcutaneous soft tissues, which may represent small
hematoma. There appears to be chronic
edema in the soft tissues. Would
recommend clinical correlation. The
remainder of the evaluation shows no other significant abnormality or abnormal
enhancement and there is no significant solid component.
If there is any further concern, surgical consult and aspiration may be considered if clinically necessary. Please see comments above.
Thank you for the referral.
XXXXXXXX
No comments:
Post a Comment